The term bandarmology has increasingly appeared in discussions among Indonesian retail investors in recent years. This approach refers to attempts to read transaction patterns of large market participants believed to have the ability to influence stock price movements. As bandarmology becomes more popular, an equally important question arises: can such practices lead to criminal consequences, especially when associated with the phenomenon of “stock market manipulation” (goreng saham) that often harms retail investors? This question is relevant because those labeled as “bandar” (market makers) are frequently associated with parties who move prices artificially, yet not all activities linked to these actors can automatically be classified as unlawful conduct from a legal perspective. It is therefore crucial to distinguish clearly between bandarmology as a legitimate analytical method and manipulative acts that may satisfy the elements of a criminal offense under capital market law.

Can Bandarmology Practices Be Criminalized? Examining the Legal Elements Behind Stock Manipulation in Indonesia’s Capital Market
Unlock the Full Article
Access the full legal analysis, insights, and linked references with a NOMOS subscription.
In-depth legal interpretation
Related regulations across jurisdictions
Case law references & citations
Downloadable formats (PDF/citations)
Choose Your Plan
Smart. Flexible. Just Right for You.
- Monthly / Yearly options
- Indonesia jurisdiction (More soon)
- For solo users or growing teams
- Enjoy a 7-day free trial on all plans
Already subscribed?
Log in
Need more users or custom pricing?
Latest Analysis