One of the fundamental weaknesses in Indonesia’s Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) is the absence of a rapid, automatic, and substantive judicial review mechanism for arrest and detention. At present, legality tests can only be carried out through praperadilan (pretrial review), which is post factum, passive, and highly formalistic, and relies on the initiative of the arrested and/or detained person. This gap opens the door to arbitrary detention practices and human rights violations.

Proposing a Probable Cause Assessment Mechanism in Indonesia: Lessons from the United States and Georgia
Unlock the Full Article
Access the full legal analysis, insights, and linked references with a NOMOS subscription.
In-depth legal interpretation
Related regulations across jurisdictions
Case law references & citations
Downloadable formats (PDF/citations)
Choose Your Plan
Smart. Flexible. Just Right for You.
- Monthly / Yearly options
- Indonesia jurisdiction (More soon)
- For solo users or growing teams
- Enjoy a 7-day free trial on all plans
Already subscribed?
Log in
Need more users or custom pricing?
Latest Analysis