The BJR doctrine must not be misinterpreted as a form of absolute impunity, nor as a grant of legal immunity to a handful of directors of corrupt disposition; rather, it must be properly positioned as a rational line of demarcation between a criminal act and the inevitability of business risk. Accordingly, the essence of proving malicious intent, conflicts of interest, and procedural violations must always be the central focus of any investigation — instead of fixating blindly on the mere occurrence of material losses.

The Urgency of the Business Judgment Rule Approach in Viewing Losses Sustained by State-Owned Enterprises
Unlock the Full Article
Access the full legal analysis, insights, and linked references with a NOMOS subscription.
In-depth legal interpretation
Related regulations across jurisdictions
Case law references & citations
Downloadable formats (PDF/citations)
Choose Your Plan
Smart. Flexible. Just Right for You.
- Monthly / Yearly options
- Indonesia jurisdiction (More soon)
- For solo users or growing teams
- Enjoy a 7-day free trial on all plans
Already subscribed?
Log in
Need more users or custom pricing?
Latest Analysis