Just days after the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court issued Letter No. 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 on Advocate Oaths (“2015 Letter”) [1] in a bid to resolve the uncertainty currently engulfing the bar association, the Constitutional Court has also rendered Decisions No. 112/PUU-XII/2014 and 36/PUU-XIII/2015 (“Decision”), which have the same objective in mind.

Constitutional Court Affirms Peradi and KAI’s Right to Request Advocate Oath Ceremonies
Unlock the Full Article
Access the full legal analysis, insights, and linked references with a NOMOS subscription.
In-depth legal interpretation
Related regulations across jurisdictions
Case law references & citations
Downloadable formats (PDF/citations)
Choose Your Plan
Smart. Flexible. Just Right for You.
- Monthly / Yearly options
- Indonesia jurisdiction (More soon)
- For solo users or growing teams
- Enjoy a 7-day free trial on all plans
Already subscribed?
Log in
Need more users or custom pricing?
Latest Analysis